Strategi Infografis untuk Komunikasi Kesehatan yang Kreatif dan Efektif: A Scoping Review Protocol

Authors

  • Ayu Anulus Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Islam Al-Azhar
  • Aris Widiyanto STIKes Mamba'ul 'Ulum Surakarta
  • Sabrina Intan Zoraya Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Islam Al-Azhar
  • Muh. Syaiful Akbar Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Bhisma Murti Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32583/pskm.v13i4.1815

Keywords:

efektif, infografis, kreatif, protocol, scoping review

Abstract

Infografis banyak digunakan untuk mendukung komunikasi kesehatan. Bukti terkait strategi penggunaan infografis untuk komunikasi kesehatan telah banyak dilaporkan, namun strategi pengolahan dan penggunaan data infografis untuk komunikasi kesehatan yang kreatif dan efektif belum dibahas secara tematis. Artikel ini menyajikan kerangka protokol dan metodologis untuk scoping review dalam mengidentifikasi dan memetakan bukti yang tersedia untuk strategi pengolahan dan penggunaan data infografis dalam komunikasi kesehatan. Tujuan artikel ini adalah menyusun protokol untuk digunakan sebagai landasan pembuatan scoping review yang telah direncanakan. Protokol scoping review akan disusun dengan menggunakan ekstensi PRISMA-ScR untuk scoping review. Dua peneliti akan mencari database elektronik (PubMed, ProQuest, dan Google Scholar) serta literatur abu-abu dan dikonsultasikan pada pakar. Informasi penting akan dikategorikan dan diklasifikasikan untuk menghasilkan ringkasan studi yang membahas tipe infografis, evaluasi penerimaan, kepuasan, dan uji pemahaman. Hasil tinjauan ini akan menghasilkan bukti untuk memandu penelitian scoping review dan berkontribusi dalam pengembangan kebijakan untuk mengoptimalkan komunikasi kesehatan yang kreatif dan efektif menggunakan infografis.

References

Arcia, A., Suero-Tejeda, N., Bales, M. E., Merrill, J. A., Yoon, S., Woollen, J., & Bakken, S. (2016). Sometimes more is more: iterative participatory design of infographics for engagement of community members with varying levels of health literacy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(1), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1093/JAMIA/OCV079

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Balkac, M., & Ergun, E. (2018). Role of Infographics in Healthcare. Chinese Medical Journal, 131(20). https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.243569

Delaney, L. (2023). Guides: Scoping Reviews: Apply PCC. University of South Australia. https://guides.library.unisa.edu.au/ScopingReviews/ApplyPCC

Dos Santos, M. B. F., Agostini, B. A., Bassani, R., Pereira, G. K. R., & Sarkis-Onofre, R. (2020). Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00939-7

Heng, H., Jazayeri, D., Shaw, L., Kiegaldie, D., Hill, A.-M., & Morris, M. E. (2019). Educating hospital patients to prevent falls: protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030952

Islam, M. S., Sarkar, T., Khan, S. H., Kamal, A. H. M., Murshid Hasan, S. M., Kabir, A., Yeasmin, D., Islam, M. A., Chowdhury, K. I. A., Anwar, K. S., Chughtai, A. A., & Seale, H. (2020). COVID-19–Related Infodemic and Its Impact on Public Health: A Global Social Media Analysis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 103(4), 1621. https://doi.org/10.4269/AJTMH.20-0812

James, P. B., Wardle, J., Steel, A., & Adams, J. (2020). An assessment of Ebola-related stigma and its association with informal healthcare utilisation among Ebola survivors in Sierra Leone: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S12889-020-8279-7

Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 1–9. https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

Mak, S., & Thomas, A. (2022). Steps for Conducting a Scoping Review. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 14(5), 565–567. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00621.1

McCrorie, A. D., Donnelly, C., & McGlade, K. J. (2016). Infographics: Healthcare Communication for the Digital Age. The Ulster Medical Journal, 85(2), 71. /pmc/articles/PMC4920488/

Mendeley. (2023). Download Mendeley Reference Manager For Desktop Windows. Mendeley. https://www.mendeley.com/download-reference-manager/windows

Neimann Rasmussen, L., & Montgomery, P. (2018). The prevalence of and factors associated with inclusion of non-English language studies in Campbell systematic reviews: A survey and meta-epidemiological study. Systematic Reviews, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13643-018-0786-6/TABLES/7

Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Khalil, H., Larsen, P., Marnie, C., Pollock, D., Tricco, A. C., & Munn, Z. (2022). Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 20(4), 953–968. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21-00242

Silagy, C. A., Middleton, P., & Hopewell, S. (2002). Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: Comparing what was done to what was planned. Jama, 287(21), 2831–2834. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2831

Siricharoen, W. V., & Siricharoen, N. (2018). Infographic Utility in Accelerating Better Health Communication. Mobile Networks and Applications, 23(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11036-017-0900-3/METRICS

Stern, C., & Kleijnen, J. (2020). Language bias in systematic reviews: You only get out what you put in. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(9), 1818–1819. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00361

Thomas, A., Lubarsky, S., Durning, S. J., & Young, M. E. (2017). Knowledge syntheses in medical education: Demystifying scoping reviews. Academic Medicine, 92(2), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001452

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

Turan, B., Budhwani, H., Fazeli, P. L., Browning, W. R., Raper, J. L., Mugavero, M. J., & Turan, J. M. (2017). How Does Stigma Affect People Living with HIV? The Mediating Roles of Internalized and Anticipated HIV Stigma in the Effects of Perceived Community Stigma on Health and Psychosocial Outcomes. AIDS and Behavior, 21(1), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10461-016-1451-5

Downloads

Published

2023-10-28

How to Cite

Anulus, A., Widiyanto, A. ., Zoraya, S. I. ., Akbar, M. S. ., & Murti, B. . (2023). Strategi Infografis untuk Komunikasi Kesehatan yang Kreatif dan Efektif: A Scoping Review Protocol. Jurnal Ilmiah Permas: Jurnal Ilmiah STIKES Kendal, 13(4), 1635–1642. https://doi.org/10.32583/pskm.v13i4.1815

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>